Poly-L-Lactide Surfaces Subjected to Long-Term Cell Cultures. Cell Proliferation and Polymer Degradation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Short term cell cultures are usually grown in contact with biomaterials to assess cytocompatibility. Depending on the rate of material degradation or corrosion, the time of culture can be a key-point in the method which, if too short, may not show any effect of the released material on the cells. A long term culture was therefore carried out with L929 fibroblast cells in contact with PLLA/PDLA samples for up to eight months. The degradation was measured in terms of shear-strength properties, intrinsic viscosity of the material and its cristallinity. The effect of the material on the cells was evaluated by measuring the growth rate of the cells. A significant decrease in the shear strength of the material was measured after three months. The rate of modification of the intrinsic viscosity was regular and decreased progressively throughout the culture period. Differential scanning calorimetry showed that the samples were initially essentially amorphous and that contact with the cell culture and its medium did not change its crystallinity level. The growth rate of the cells was not modified by the presence of the material when compared to the control. This study showed this material to be cytocompatible for a long period of time, even after detection of modifications of its physico-chemical properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".