MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AEROSOL TRANSFER OF BLADDER UROTHELIAL AND SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS ONTO DEMUCOSALIZED COLONIC SEGMENTS FOR PORCINE BLADDER AUGMENTATION IN VIVO: A 6-WEEK EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

2005· article· en· W2145952962 on OpenAlexaff
Ashraf T. Hafez, Kourosh Afshar, Darius Bägli, André Bahoric, Karen Aitken, C. Smith, Antoine E. Khoury

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFibrin glueSmooth muscleHuman bladderIn vivoAnatomyPathologyUrologyBladder cancerSurgeryBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: In a pilot study we developed a cell transfer technology for populating demucosalized colonic segments with bladder urothelium. This process was achieved through aerosol transfer of a single cell suspension consisting of bladder urothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibrin glue onto demucosalized colonic segments. We further evaluate this new concept in a controlled study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed on 20 piglets (20 kg). In all animals 50% of the bladder with excised, and a 10 cm segment of the sigmoid was isolated. Animals were then equally divided into 5 groups of 1) colocystoplasty only, 2) demucosalized colocystoplasty, 3) demucosalized colocystoplasty plus covering of the demucosalized sigmoid with fibrin glue only, 4) aerosol application of fibrin glue with single cell suspension of urothelial cells only to the demucosalized colon, and 5) aerosol application of fibrin glue with urothelial and smooth muscle cells to the demucosalized colon. The 4 corners of the augmented segments were marked with 5-zero polypropylene sutures. Animals were sacrificed 6 weeks later and the surface area of the augmented segment was measured. Segments were submitted to histological and immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: The surface area of the augmented segments showed an increase in group 1 animals, stabilization in groups 4 and 5, and marked reduction in groups 2 and 3. On hematoxylin and eosin, and Masson trichrome staining all group 1 animals showed normal colonic epithelium of the augment. All animals in groups 2 and 3 showed excessive scarring with urothelial coverage only at the augment periphery, while the central augment area showed no epithelium. Segments from groups 4 and 5 showed confluent epithelial covering with no fibrosis. There was no evidence of colonic epithelial re-growth in any animal in groups 2 to 5. Cytokeratin 7 and uroplakin III staining demonstrated complete coverage of the augmented segment with urothelium only in groups 4 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of aerosolized cells of urological origin is a viable augmentation approach that appears to achieve the much sought after inhibition of intrinsic fibrosis and contraction of colonic segments when incorporated into the urinary tract without this cellular component. Moreover, this technique appears to provide a histologically normal, confluent urothelium, which sets the stage for prevention of the well-documented biochemical aberrations inherent in augments containing gastrointestinal epithelium. While successful in this model regardless of the incorporation of urological smooth muscle cells, chronic studies are now warranted to validate the short-term results as well as determine whether the urological mesenchymal population (smooth muscle) will be required to sustain the uroepithelial phenotype in the long term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207