Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueNuclear Physics B · 2013
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityTRIUMFCarleton UniversityUniversity of ReginaUniversity of VictoriaMcGill UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNuclear PhysicsInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchGoddard Space Flight CenterDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaH. Lundbeck A/SState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMRoyal SocietyCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueGeorgian National Science FoundationMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueIsrael Science FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoLundbeckfondenDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAustrian Science FundNational Science CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSScience and Engineering Research BoardNational Science FoundationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFAmerican Roentgen Ray SocietyArizona-Nevada Academy of ScienceServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)CERNDanmarks GrundforskningsfondMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsPhysicsRapidityJet (fluid)PhotonNuclear physicsInvariant massBinAzimuthLarge Hadron ColliderParticle physicsLuminosityQuantum chromodynamicsTransverse planeScrollOpticsGalaxyAstrophysicsMathematics
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it