MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145982316 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2001.980986

Control for canceling periodic disturbances with uncertain frequency

2003· article· en· W2145982316 on OpenAlexaff
Lyndon J. Brown, Qing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Internal modelAutomatic frequency controlController (irrigation)Perturbation (astronomy)Singular perturbationComputer scienceStability (learning theory)LTI system theoryIdeal (ethics)MathematicsControl (management)Linear systemMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents an algorithm to cancel periodic disturbances with uncertain frequency. The disturbances are canceled using a controller with an internal model structure in parallel with a traditional PI controller. It is shown that under ideal circumstances the time varying states of the internal model can be mapped to two time invariant variables, the magnitude or energy of the internal model and the difference between the nominal error frequency and the true error frequency. An additional integral controller then can be used to reduce this error to zero. The stability of the feedback control system including this algorithm is justified by singular perturbation theory. Simulations demonstrate the validity of the analytical results, the ability of this algorithm to identify the frequency of periodic disturbances and the capability of this feedback control system to reject periodic disturbances with uncertainty in frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228)Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207