MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145991395 · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2010.2099750

Passivity Verification of Delayed Rational Function Based Macromodels of Tabulated Networks Characterized by Scattering Parameters

2011· article· en· W2145991395 on OpenAlex
Andrew Charest, M. Nakhla, Ramachandra Achar, D. Saraswat

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityMathematical proofEigenvalues and eigenvectorsRational functionApplied mathematicsFunction (biology)ScatteringHamiltonian (control theory)MathematicsScattering parametersControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisComputer scienceMathematical optimizationPhysicsEngineeringGeometryQuantum mechanicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a generalized theory for passivity verification of delayed rational function (DRF) macromodels representing electrically long networks that are characterized by multiport tabulated scattering parameters is presented. In the proposed approach, passivity verification of DRF macromodels is formulated as a quasi-periodic frequency-dependent generalized eigenvalue problem, using which, the necessary search region for passivity violations is reduced to just a single period along the imaginary axis. Necessary theoretical foundations and the related proofs are developed. Further, a computationally more efficient method based on half-Hamiltonian size frequency-dependent generalized eigenvalue problem is developed. Numerical validations for both the full-size and half-size formulations are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it