MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146116084 · doi:10.1677/jme.1.01628

Mechanism of transcriptional regulation of LRP16 gene expression by 17-β estradiol in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells

2005· article· en· W2146116084 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Y-L Zhao, Qingli Li, Y-M Mu, X-C Lu, Li Yu, H-J Song, X Li, J-M Lu, C-Y Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Endocrinology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsTransactivationReporter geneChromatin immunoprecipitationMolecular biologyPromoterHeLaBiologyGeneGene expressionEstrogen receptor alphaRegulation of gene expressionEctopic expressionEstrogen receptorGeneticsCell cultureCancerBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LRP16 gene expression is induced by 17-betaestradiol (E2) via estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. A previous study also demonstrated that ectopic expression of LRP16 gene promoted MCF-7 cell proliferation. To explore the mechanism of hormone-induced LRP16 gene expression, the LRP16 gene promoter region (-2600 to -24 bp upstream of the LRP16 gene translation starting site) was analyzed in the present study by using different 5'-truncated constructs, and a luciferase reporter. The 5'-flanking sequence of -676 to -24 bp (pGL3-S5) was found to be E2-responsive. After exchange of the fragment from -213 to -24 bp with the TK gene proximal promoter region in pGL3-S5, E2 still induced reporter gene activity in MCF-7 and HeLa cells. Sequence analysis showed that the pGL3-S6 (-676 to -214) sequence contains two motifs that may contribute to E2-induced transactivation; namely, an estrogen-responsive element (ERE) half-site/Sp1 at -246 to -227 bp and an E-box site at -225 to -219 bp. Further deletion and mutation analysis of these two motifs indicated that both the 1/2 ERE and Sp1 binding sites were required for E2 action, while E-box deletion did not affect the luciferase activity in MCF-7 and HeLa cells. The results of gel mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays confirmed that both ERalphaand Sp1 were required for hormone-induced transactivation, which involved both ERalphaand Sp1 directly binding to DNA. Taken together, these findings suggest that ERalphaand Sp1 play a role in activation of the human LRP16 gene promoter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular EndocrinologySame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207