MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146325777 · doi:10.1177/0027950109354531

The World Economy: Consumer Spending and the Financial Crisis

2009· article· en· W2146325777 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dawn Holland, Ray Barrell, Tatiana Fic, Ian Hurst, Iana Liadze, Ali Orazgani, Rachel Whitworth

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Institute Economic Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsFinancial crisisDebtGovernment (linguistics)Government debtHousehold debtEconomyMonetary economicsFinanceMacroeconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lack of adequate banking regulation by supervisors and flawed assessment of risk by financial institutions over the past several years has proved extremely costly. We estimate that the level of global output declined by a cumulative 2.4 per cent between the onset of the crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the first quarter of 2009, with a decline of 4 per cent in the OECD economies over the same period. This is equivalent to a loss of roughly $850 billion relative to what was then considered potential output. We estimate that government debt levels in the OECD economies have risen by about 25 per cent in aggregate, entailing many years of higher tax burdens to come, a rise in long-term real interest rates and lower levels of income-generating wealth. The level of employment in the OECD economies declined by 2.2 per cent between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009, and we expect a further 2.5 million people will lose their jobs in the OECD economies by early 2010. While we expect growth to resume by the end of this year in most countries, the level of output in the OECD will remain permanently lower than was expected fifteen months ago. The degree of scarring in individual economies depends on the extent to which lenders underestimated risk before the crisis and the recent rise in the economy's government debt burden. This is discussed in greater detail in a note on pp. 36–8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Institute Economic ReviewSame topicGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207