MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146347493 · doi:10.1080/09687680118799

The ENT family of eukaryote nucleoside and nucleobase transporters: recent advances in the investigation of structure/function relationships and the identification of novel isoforms

2001· article· en· W2146347493 on OpenAlexaff
Ralph J. Hyde, Carol E. Cass, James D. Young, James D. Stephen A. Baldwin

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Membrane Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleosideGene isoformBiologyTransporterComputational biologyProtein familyEukaryoteNucleobaseTransmembrane proteinNucleoside transporterGeneticsGenomeGeneDNAReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first examples of the equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) family were characterized in human tissues at the molecular level only 4 years ago. Since that time, the identification of homologous proteins by functional cloning and genome analysis has revealed that the family is widely distributed in eukaryotes. Family members are predicted to possess 11 transmembrane helices (TMs), and recent investigations on the mammalian ENTs have implicated the TM 3-6 region in solute recognition. Whilst the name of the family reflects the properties of its prototypical member hENT1, an equilibrative transporter of nucleosides, some family members can also transport nucleobases and some are proton-dependent, concentrative transporters. In addition to their role in nucleoside salvage, ENTs are targets for coronary vasodilator drugs and act as routes for uptake of cytotoxic drugs in humans and protozoa. This paper summarizes current knowledge of the family and reports on the identification of a novel mammalian ENT isoform, designated ENT3, from mouse and human tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations209
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Membrane BiologySame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207