The Underlying Structure of Adaptation under Strong Selection in 12 Experimental Yeast Populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aims of this study were to determine (i) whether adaptation under strong selection occurred through mutations in a narrow target of one or a few nucleotide sites or a broad target of numerous sites and (ii) whether the programs of adaptation previously observed from three experimental populations were unique or shared among populations that underwent parallel evolution. We used archived population samples from a previous study, representing 500 generations of experimental evolution in 12 populations under strong selection, 6 populations in a high-salt environment and 6 populations in a low-glucose environment. Each set of six populations included four with sexual reproduction and two with exclusively asexual reproduction. Populations were sampled as resequenced genomes of 115 individuals and as bulk samples from which frequencies of mutant alleles were estimated. In a high-salt environment, a broad target of 11 mutations within the proton exporter, PMA1, was observed among the six populations, in addition to expansions of the ENA gene cluster. This pattern was shared among populations that underwent parallel evolution. In a low-glucose environment, two programs of adaptation were observed. The originally observed pattern of mutation in MDS3/MKT1 in population M8 was a narrow target of a single nucleotide, unique to this population. Among the other five populations, the three mutations were shared in a broad target, sensing/signaling genes RAS1 and RAS2. RAS1/RAS2 mutations were not observed in the high-salt populations; PMA1 mutations were observed only in a high-salt environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".