Presentation of Low Anorectal Malformations Beyond the Neonatal Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Anorectal malformations are usually diagnosed at birth, but some patients have presented to this institution beyond the early newborn period without recognition of their anorectal malformations. To quantify the extent of this problem, we undertook a review of all patients presenting to this hospital with anorectal malformations. METHODS: We reviewed all new cases of anorectal malformations treated at British Columbia's Children's Hospital during the past 11 years. We looked specifically at the time of diagnosis, patient age, sex and mode of presentation, the type of anorectal malformations, and any associated anomalies. RESULTS: One hundred twenty new cases of anorectal malformations were seen here, of whom, 15 patients (9 girls and 6 boys) presented beyond the early newborn period. Of these, 1 male infant was diagnosed at 2 weeks of age and another girl at 14 years of age. The remaining 13 presented between 3 and 11 months of age because of increasing constipation, usually associated with the introduction of solid foods. All had low anorectal malformations. Nine patients had at least 1 other feature of the VACTERL complex. CONCLUSIONS: Most anorectal malformations are identified at birth, but a significant number of the milder lesions may not be recognized until later. Therefore, this condition must be considered in older infants and children presenting with constipation, particularly if they also have cardiac or genitourinary anomalies. constipation, imperforate anus, VACTERL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".