MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146421374 · doi:10.3828/bhs.2015.05

Rethinking Violence: <i>La casa grande</i> 's Role in the Modernization of the Colombian Novel and Theatre

2015· article· en· W2146421374 on OpenAlexaff
Gina Beltrán

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Hispanic Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory and Politics in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernization theoryHumanitiesHistorySociologyArtGender studiesPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente articulo examina La casa grande de Alvaro Cepeda Samudio como un texto fundamental dentro de la modernizacion de la novela colombiana y dentro del ambiente cultural del pais en los sesenta. El estudia rastrea la manera en que Cepeda Samudio se vale de la ambiguedad del evento historico de la masacre de las bananeras para construir un texto heterogeneo de voces superpuestas. La novela explora el tema de la violencia desde una perspectiva subjetiva que contrapone los limites cognitivos del mito y de la historia, y que revela la insuficiencia de la experiencia personal como base de un entendimiento riguroso de la crisis historica. Este articulo sostiene que el desarrollo de mecanismos esteticos y narrativos en La casa grande constituye un nuevo acercamiento critico y conceptual a la violencia social y politica colombiana. Detalla, ademas, la contribucion de la novela al desarrollo y modernizacion del nuevo teatro colombiano.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.023
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Hispanic StudiesSame topicHistory and Politics in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207