MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146424165 · doi:10.1094/pdis-94-6-0782b

First Record of <i>Trichodorus primitivus</i> and Morphological and Molecular Identification of <i>Longidorus elongatus</i> from Canada

2010· article· en· W2146424165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Majid Pedram, Gholamreza Niknam, R. T. Robbins, W. Decraemer, W Ye, Qibin Yu

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySponge spiculePoa pratensisNematologyNematodeBotanyVeterinary medicineAnatomyEcologyPoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During July 2008, sandy loam soil samples were collected near the rhizosphere of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) at a depth of 15 to 20 cm from Caledonia Park, Toronto, Canada. Samples were suspended in water and nematodes were collected on sieves with 250- and 74-μm openings. Among the nematodes recovered were one species of Longidorus Micoletzky, 1922 (4) and one species of Trichodorus Cobb, 1913. The Trichodorus species (2), was identified as T. primitivus (de Man, 1880) Micoletzky, 1922, in which females have rod-like sclerotized pieces parallel to the vagina lumen, each with dimensions of 3.1 × 1.2 μm and at a distance of 2 to 3 μm from each other; and males have spicules with a wide nonoffset capitulum and very narrow blade, three ventromedian cervical papillae (CP), and three precloacal supplements with the anterior one at the level of the capitulum of retracted spicules. Males showed unusual variation in the position of CP2 (i.e., posterior to the onchiostyle region, except for one specimen with CP2 located within the posterior onchiostyle region, which is typical for the species). The morphometric data for nine males are: L, 665 to 805 μm; a, 23.0 to 27.5; b, 3.7 to 5.2; c, 46 to 56; onchiostyle, 47 to 52 μm; and spicules, 32.5 to 40.5 μm. Measurements for 13 females are: L, 630 to 775 μm; a, 20.5 to 24.8; b, 3.5 to 5.5; c, 75.5 to 158.5; and V, 54 to 61%. To our knowledge, this is the first report of T. primitivus in Canada. According to Chen et al. (1), the Longidorus species was identified as L. elongatus (de Man, 1876) Micoletzky, 1922 (3). The morphometric data for females (n = 13) are: L, 5.1 to 6.0 mm; a, 78.5 to 106.5; b, 11.5 to 13.5; c, 86.0 to 120.5; V, 45.5 to 53.0%; odontostyle, 79 to 91 μm; odontophore, 57.5 to 66.5 μm; and tail length, 44.5 to 59.0 μm. Males were not found. Four juvenile stages were identified. J1 (n = 2) with a body length of 1.1, 1.2 mm and replacement/functional odontostyle 59, 59/53.5, 54.5 μm, J2 (n = 2) with L: 1.7, 2.0 mm and replacement/functional odontostyle 62.5, 68.0/58.7 μm, 59.0, J3 (n = 2): L: 2.8, 3.0 mm and replacement/functional odontostyle 76.5, 77/66.5, 67.0 μm and J4 (n = 2) with L: 3.6, 3.8 mm and replacement/functional odontostyle 87.0, 90.5/75.0, 77.5 μm. Due to large morphometric overlap in Longidorus species identification, 2,472 bp of the near full-length 18S and the internal transcribed spacer 1 region of rDNA (Accession No. GU199044) were sequenced. The Blastn search of the partial 18S revealed 100% identity with a population of L. elongatus from Scotland (GenBank No. AY687992, 1,707 bp compared), 99% identity (3 bp difference, 1,707 bp compared) with a population of L. elongatus from Iran (EU503141) and 99% identity (4 bp difference, 1,707 bp compared) with a population of L. elongatus (AF036594, sample location unknown). A Blastn search of the 18S and ITS region revealed only 1 to 3 bp differences with two populations of L. elongatus from Switzerland (AJ549986 and AJ549987) and a population of L. elongatus (AF511417) from Scotland. These molecular data further confirmed the identity of the population from Canada to be L. elongatus. References: (1) Q. Chen et al. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 20:15, 1997. (2) W. Decraemer. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1995. (3) J. G. de Man. Tijdschr. Ned. Dierk. Ver. 2:78, 1876. (4) H. Micoletzky. Archiv. Naturgesch. 87:1, 1922.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207