Nuclear Spin-Lattice Relaxation in Superlattices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate in a superlattice subjected to a strong magnetic field H parallel to its axis is studied theoretically. The energy conservation law allows flip-flop spin-reversal processes due to the hyperfine interaction between the nuclear and electron spins only in some intervals of H. In particular, the width of the highest occupied superlattice subband /spl Delta/ must exceed the spin splitting of Landau levels, which results in the relaxation offset at some critical magnetic field H/sub 2/. At H<H/sub 2/ and low temperatures, the relaxation rate T/sub 1//sup -1/ versus H dependence has giant oscillations depending on the Fermi level position. The behavior of T/sub 1/ can be changed by the tilting of the magnetic field, decreasing the Landau level separation at a constant spin-splitting. At some critical tilt angle, these two quantities become equal and inter-Landau-level processes come into action which drastically increases the relaxation rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".