MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146507350 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2005.1516866

Analysis of multiconductor transmission lines with frequency-dependent parameters and incident electromagnetic fields

2005· article· en· W2146507350 on OpenAlexaff
G. Shinh, Natalie Nakhla, Ramachandra Achar, M. Nakhla, Ihsan Erdin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEMIElectromagnetic interferenceRepresentation (politics)Transient (computer programming)Electric power transmissionTransmission lineElectronic engineeringElectromagnetic compatibilityConducted electromagnetic interferenceStability (learning theory)Computer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Interference (communication)Transient responseEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an efficient algorithm for transient analysis of multiconductor transmission lines (MTL) with frequency-dependent parameters subjected to electromagnetic interference (EMI). A closed-form formulation in terms of split representation of equivalent sources is proposed to account for EMI induced effects. A compact and passive macromodel based on delay extraction and closed-form representation is used to describe the distributed nature of the MTL stamp. The proposed algorithm, while guaranteeing the stability of the simulation by employing passive macromodels, provides significant speed-up for EMI analysis of transmission line networks, especially with large delay and low losses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005.Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207