The Conditions of Unitateral Resiliation of Contracts (La Résiliation Unilatérale Ou Les Joies De L’Exégèse) (French)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the civil law, contracts of successive performance may be interrupted in a number of ways. Among those, the interruption that is initiated unilaterally by one of the parties is subject to distinct regimes which flow from the circumstances of the interruption. Moving beyond the fluctuating terminology of the civil law in this field, the author examines three different types of unilateral repudiation of the contract: a party's decision to put an end to the contract may constitute an in execution of its obligations; it may be a remedy for the other party's failure; or it may be the exercise of a prerogative. This typology is explored here in relation to three nominate contracts: the contract of employment, the contract of enterprise, and the contract of mandate.En droit civil, les contrats valablement formes dont l'execution s'etend dans le temps s'interrompent de differentes manieres. Parmi celles-ci, la fin du contrat qui survient a l'initiative de l'une des parties est assujettie a des regimes distincts selon les circonstances. Par dela la terminologie inconstante du droit civil dans ce champ, l'auteur distingue ici trois cas defigure: une partie peut repudier le contrat de maniere fautive, ou pour sanctionner l'inexecution de l'autre, ou encore dans l'exercice d'une faculte. Trois contrats nommes (les contrats de travail, d' entreprise et de mandat) sont etudies pour mettre en lumiere le regime propre a chaque type d'interruption du contrat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".