Clinical Features of Patients with Morphea and the Pansclerotic Subtype: A Cross-sectional Study from the Morphea in Adults and Children Cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pansclerotic morphea is a poorly described form of morphea with little information on prevalence, demographics, and clinical features. Classification criteria for this subtype varies and the distinction from other forms of morphea, such as extensive generalized morphea and pansclerotic morphea, is not always clear. The purpose of our study was to clarify classification criteria for pansclerotic morphea by identifying its prevalence in the morphea in adults and children (MAC) cohort and describing its demographic and clinical features as compared with generalized morphea. METHODS: Patients who met predefined criteria for generalized and pansclerotic morphea were identified using a modified Laxer and Zulian classification system. Baseline demographic and clinical features of the patients were compiled and then analyzed for traits characteristic of pansclerotic morphea versus those of generalized morphea. One hundred and thirteen patients met the criteria for inclusion: pansclerotic (n = 13) and generalized morphea type (n = 100). RESULTS: Patients with pansclerotic morphea were more frequently male (46.2% vs 6%; p < 0.0001); had a shorter time to diagnosis (mean difference of 10.4 mos; 95% CI: 0.8-19.9 mos; p = 0.0332); higher rates of functional impairment (61.5% vs 16%; p = 0.0046); higher rates of deep involvement (61.5% vs 17%; p = 0.004); and higher average Rodnan Skin Score (mean difference of 10.8 points; 95% CI: 5-16.6; p = 0.0017), Localized Scleroderma Skin Damage Index (mean difference 28.3; 95% CI: 9-47.6; p = 0.009), and Physician Global Assessment of Disease Damage scores (mean difference 25.1; 95% CI: 0.3-50; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest demographic and clinical features are sufficient to define the pansclerotic subtype as they represent a distinct clinical phenotype with a more rapidly progressive and severe course commonly accompanied by disability. Presence of features of the pansclerotic phenotype should alert practitioners to the possibility of significant morbidity and the need for early aggressive treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".