Reversible binding of water, methanol, and ethanol to a five-coordinate ruthenium(ii) complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The known green, five-coordinate, square-pyramidal trans-RuCl(2)(P-N)(PPh(3)) complex reversibly binds water, MeOH and EtOH in the vacant coordination site in the solid state and in CH(2)Cl(2) solution to give pink adducts (P-N = o-diphenylphosphino-N,N'-dimethylaniline). The adducts are well characterized, including X-ray analysis of the aqua complex, trans-RuCl(2)(P-N)(PPh(3))(H(2)O), which crystallizes in two different benzene-solvated forms. Comparison of the structural data with those determined previously for the binding of H(2)S, thiols, and H(2), which form cis-RuX(2)(P-N)(PPh(3))L products (X = Cl, Br; L = a S-ligand or H(2)) reveals the trans-influence trend P > H(2)S ~ thiols > H(2) > Cl ~ Br > H(2)O. Thermodynamic data for the binding of water were estimated in solution by UV-Vis spectroscopy, and ΔH(o) data for the aqua and alcohol adducts in the solid state were obtained by differential scanning calorimetry. Inclusion of published data for the S-ligand adducts reveals the thermal stability trend of the solid complexes as MeSH > MeOH > H(2)S > H(2)O > EtSH > EtOH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".