Lipid Rafts Mediate Association of LFA-1 and CD3 and Formation of the Immunological Synapse of CTL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lipid rafts accumulate in the immunological synapse formed by an organized assembly of the TCR/CD3, LFA-1, and signaling molecules. However, the precise role of lipid rafts in the formation of the immunological synapse is unclear. In this study, we show that LFA-1 on CTL is constitutively active and mediates Ag-independent binding of CTL to target cells expressing its ligands. LFA-1 and CD3 on CTL, but not resting T cells, colocalize in lipid rafts. Binding of LFA-1 on CTL to targets initiates the formation of the immunological synapse, which is formed by LFA-1, CD3, and ganglioside GM1 distributed in the periphery of the cell contact site and cholesterol is more widely distributed. The formation of this synapse is Ag independent, but the recognition of Ag by the TCR induces accumulation of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins in the synapse as well as redistribution of the microtubule organization center toward the cell contact site. Our results suggest that LFA-1 recruits lipid rafts and the TCR/CD3 to the synapse, and facilitates efficient and rapid activation of CTL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".