Immigrants en banlieue et politiques publiques municipales : le cas lavallois (Québec, Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommaire : L'installation croissante d'immigrants récents en banlieue a contribuéà décentrer l'intérêt des chercheurs et des décideurs pour les grandes villes en faveur des villes qui les entourent, écorchant au passage plusieurs stéréotypes sur les villes « blanches » et « riches » des banlieues nord-américaines. Notre article participe à cet intérêt renouvelé en proposant une analyse des politiques publiques à destination des immigrants et des minorités ethnoculturelles à Laval, située au nord de Montréal. L'article démontre qu'une politique a été implantée à Laval depuis le début des années 1990 et qu'elle s'explique par une configuration institutionnelle spécifique qui évolue dans le temps. Nous avons distingué deux configurations institutionnelles qui déterminent deux séquences distinctes de cette politique. La première (1990–2003) est marquée par une configuration institutionnelle qui ferme les canaux de représentation des intérêts des immigrants et des minorités ethnoculturelles sur la scène municipale et la seconde séquence (2003–2009) se caractérise par la régionalisation de la fermeture des canaux de médiation à la représentation de ces intérêts. Pour les deux séquences, la fermeture des canaux de médiation est illustrée dans trois secteurs de cette politique publique : les ententes intergouvernementales, la reconnaissance des associations et la discrimination positive dans la fonction publique municipale. Abstract: The growing number of new immigrants settling in suburban communities has caused researchers and policy-makers to shift their focus from large cities to the communities that surround them, thereby side-swiping several stereotypes commonly associated with “white” and “wealthy” suburban cities in North America. My article responds to this recent interest by proposing an analysis of the public policies that apply to immigrants and ethno-cultural minorities in Laval, north of Montreal. The article establishes that Laval has had a policy in place since the early 1990s, with a specific institutional configuration that changes over time. I discerned two institutional configurations shaping two distinct sequences for this policy. The first sequence (1990–2003) involved an institutional configuration that shut down the channels for the representation of the interests of immigrants and ethno-cultural minorities on the municipal level, and the second sequence (2003–2009) was marked by the regionalization of the shutdown of the mediation channels for the representation of these interests. In each sequence, the shutdown of the mediation channels is illustrated in three areas of this public policy: intergovernmental agreements, the recognition of associations, and affirmative action in the municipal public service.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".