Characteristics and Use of Yellow Stripe Trevally Hydrolysate as Culture Media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characteristics and the use as culture media of protein hydrolysate from yellow stripe trevally (HF(25)) were determined in comparison with Bacto Peptone. HF(25) had the higher contents of ash (45.73%), lipid (0.77%), and moisture (4.34%) but lower protein content (42.11%) than did Bacto Peptone (P < 0.05). HF(25) powder was slightly darker than Bacto Peptone (P < 0.05). HF(25) contained a higher amount of essential amino acids (44.05%) than did Bacto Peptone (19.34%). HF(25) and Bacto Peptone consisted of several minerals at varying levels and had an excellent solubility over a wide pH range. At water activity (a(w)) greater than 0.75, the much higher moisture sorption was found in HF(25) (P < 0.05). HF(25) showed the higher bacterial productivity ratio than did Bacto Peptone (P < 0.05). When HF(25) and commercial Bacto Peptone were used as microbial media to determine microbial load of environmental and food samples and pathogenic bacteria, HF(25) generally exhibited similar potential in culturing those microorganisms (P > 0.05). Thus, the conversion of low market value species to fish protein hydrolysate, which can be used as the nitrogenous substrate for microbial growth, could be achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".