<i>Leishmania</i> Antigens Are Presented to CD8+ T Cells by a Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing-Independent Pathway In Vitro and In Vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CD8+ T cells are generated in response to Leishmania major (Lm) or Toxoplasma gondii parasitic infections, indicating that exogenously delivered Ag can be processed for presentation by MHC class I molecules. We show that presentation of Lm nucleotidase (NT)-OVA is TAP independent in vivo and in vitro, and is inhibited by chloroquine, but not by proteasome inhibitors. In contrast, the presentation of T. gondii P30-OVA relies on the TAP/proteasome pathway. Presentation of OVA- or rNT-OVA-coated beads also bypassed TAP requirement above a certain Ag threshold. TAP was also dispensable for the presentation of wild-type Lm Ags to primed CD8+ T cells in vitro. Finally, in vivo priming of CD8+ T cells involved in acquired resistance to Lm was not compromised in TAP-deficient mice. Thus, Leishmania Ags appear to be confined to an intraphagosomal processing pathway that requires higher concentrations of Ags, suggesting that these parasites may have evolved strategies to impair the efficient endoplasmic reticulum-based, TAP-dependent cross-presentation pathway to avoid or delay CD8+ T cell priming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".