MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146804547 · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwg067

Catalytic mechanism of the inverting N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I: DFT quantum mechanical model of the reaction pathway and determination of the transition state structure

2003· article· en· W2146804547 on OpenAlexaff
Igor Tvaroška

Bibliographic record

VenueGlycobiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransition stateChemistryCatalysisReaction mechanismPotential energy surfaceTransition state theoryDensity functional theoryReaction coordinateActive siteResidue (chemistry)GlycanComputational chemistryStereochemistryMoleculeGlycoproteinKineticsReaction rate constantOrganic chemistryBiochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex N-glycan structures on glycoproteins play important roles in cell adhesion and recognition events in metazoan organisms. A critical step in the biosynthetic pathway leading from high mannose to these complex structures includes the transfer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) to a mannose residue by the inverting N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (GnT-I). The catalytic mechanism of this enzymatic reaction is explored herein using DFT quantum chemical methods. The computational model used to follow the reaction is based on the X-ray crystallographic structure of GnT-I and contains 127 atoms that represent fragments of residues critical for the substrate binding and catalysis. The mechanism of the catalytic reaction was monitored by means of a 2D potential energy map calculated as a function of predefined reaction coordinates at the B3LYP/6-31G** level. This potential energy surface revealed one transition state associated with a reaction pathway following a concerted mechanism. The reaction barrier was estimated, and the structure of the transition state was characterized at the B3LYP/6-311++G**// B3LYP/6-31G** level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlycobiologySame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207