Peripherally–derived olfactory ensheathing cells do not promote primary afferent regeneration following dorsal root injury
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) may support axonal regrowth, and thus might be a viable treatment for spinal cord injury (SCI); however, peripherally-derived OECs remain untested in most animal models of SCI. We have transplanted OECs from the lamina propria (LP) of mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) in all cell types into immunosuppressed rats with cervical or lumbar dorsal root injuries. LP-OECs were deposited into either the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), intact or injured dorsal roots, or the dorsal columns via the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ). LP-OECs injected into the DRG or dorsal root migrated centripetally, and migration was more extensive in the injured root than in the intact root. These peripherally deposited OECs migrated within the PNS but did not cross the DREZ; similarly, large- or small-caliber primary afferents were not seen to regenerate across the DREZ. LP-OEC deposition into the dorsal columns via the DREZ resulted in a laminin-rich injection track: due to the pipette trajectory, this track pierced the glia limitans at the DREZ. OECs migrated centrifugally through this track, but did not traverse the DREZ; axons entered the spinal cord via this track, but were not seen to reenter CNS tissue. We found a preferential association between CGRP-positive small- to medium-diameter afferents and OEC deposits in injured dorsal roots as well as within the spinal cord. In the cord, OEC deposition resulted in increased angiogenesis and altered astrocyte alignment. These data are the first to demonstrate interactions between sensory axons and peripherally-derived OECs following dorsal root injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it