Effects of three herbicides on whole-plant carbon fixation and water use by yellow nutsedge (<i>Cyperus esculentus</i>)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three herbicides were compared for their ability to reduce both carbon fixation and soil water depletion by yellow nutsedge in a growth chamber study. Whole-plant CO 2 exchange and water use were measured for 11 d after herbicide application. MSMA reduced carbon assimilation relative to the untreated control 1 d after treatment, and by 5 d after treatment respiration exceeded carbon assimilation during the photoperiod; however, MSMA had no significant effect on whole-plant water use during the measurement period. Halosulfuron reduced gross carbon assimilation to 30% of the pretreatment rate by the end of the experiment, but in contrast to MSMA it also strongly suppressed water use. Mesotrione never reduced carbon assimilation below 59% of the pretreatment rate and had no measurable effect on water use. Halosulfuron and MSMA reduced shoot regrowth to between 0 and 5% of the control, whereas mesotrione treatment allowed some 58% regrowth. These results indicate that whereas both MSMA and halosulfuron should provide effective control of yellow nutsedge, halosulfuron may be better able to rapidly suppress the weed's ability to compete for available soil water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it