MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146905668 · doi:10.1261/rna.193306

Restriction for gene insertion within the <i>Lactococcus lactis</i> Ll.LtrB group II intron

2006· article· en· W2146905668 on OpenAlexafffund
Isabelle Plante, Benoit Cousineau

Bibliographic record

VenueRNA · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University
KeywordsLactococcus lactisBiologyIntronInsertion sequenceGeneGroup II intronGeneticsPrimer extensionRNA splicingMolecular biologyRNABacteriaTransposable elementGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ll.LtrB intron, from the low G+C gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis, was the first bacterial group II intron shown to splice and mobilize in vivo. The detailed retrohoming and retrotransposition pathways of Ll.LtrB were studied in both L. lactis and Escherichia coli. This bacterial retroelement has many features that would make it a good gene delivery vector. Here we report that the mobility efficiency of Ll.LtrB expressing LtrA in trans is only slightly affected by the insertion of fragments <100 nucleotides within the loop region of domain IV. In contrast, Ll.LtrB mobility efficiency is drastically decreased by the insertion of foreign sequences >1 kb. We demonstrate that the inhibitory effect caused by the addition of expression cassettes on Ll.LtrB mobility efficiency is not sequence specific, and not due to the expression, or the toxicity, of the cargo genes. Using genetic screens, we demonstrate that in order to maintain intron mobility, the loop region of domain IV, more specifically domain IVb, is by far the best region to insert foreign sequences within Ll.LtrB. Poisoned primer extension and Northern blot analyses reveal that Ll.LtrB constructs harboring cargo sequences splice less efficiently, and show a significant reduction in lariat accumulation in L. lactis. This suggests that cargo-containing Ll.LtrB variants are less stable. These results reveal the potential, yet limitations, of the Ll.LtrB group II intron to be used as a gene delivery vector, and validate the random insertion approach described in this study to create cargo-containing Ll.LtrB variants that are mobile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRNASame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207