Effects of a New Functional-Sexological Treatment for Premature Ejaculation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Premature ejaculation is the most-prevalent sexual problem in men. Various treatments have been developed to increase control over the moment of ejaculation, with two of the most frequent techniques used in behavior therapy being the squeeze method developed by Masters and Johnson (1970) and the "stop-and-start" technique described by Semans (1956). These treatments are effective and improve matters in most cases. However, couples can be averse to using them, with some women reluctant to squeeze their partner's penis and some couples unwilling to interrupt sexual interaction once initiated. Under a new functional-sexological treatment intended to improve control over the moment of ejaculation, men learn how to control their arousal without having to interrupt sexual activity. In this study, we compared three groups of couples in which the man suffered from premature ejaculation. One followed the new functional-sexological treatment, another followed a behavioral treatment--including the squeeze and stop-and-start techniques--and a control group was placed on a waiting list. We used several questionnaires to assess the effects of the various treatments. Moreover, subjects provided an objective measure of duration of intercourse from penetration to ejaculation. These measures were taken pre- and posttreatment and at three-month follow-up. We ran analyses of variance to assess the effects of the treatments. Results indicate that the new treatment is very effective. We observed significant improvements in duration of intercourse, sexual satisfaction, and sexual functioning. The subjects in the behavioral treatment group obtained similar results. Furthermore, subjects from both groups were satisfied with their respective treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it