MétaCan
← all works

Defining the RGG/RG Motif

2013· review· en· 709 citations· W2146926661 on OpenAlex· 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.021

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Canadian funderA Canadian agency funded it. The work may carry no Canadian affiliation at all.

Classifier prediction

metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90

Predictions imitate two machine teachers. Scores are not calibrated prevalence probabilities.

Classifier candidate
Not applicable
Classifier consensus
N/A
Teacher imitation scores

Codex

Other design0.911
Bench or experimental0.001
Not applicable0.001
Systematic review0.001
Theoretical or conceptual0.001
Metaresearch0.000
Open science0.000
Simulation or modelling0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Case report0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Research integrity0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Bibliometrics0.000
Qualitative0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Observational0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000

Gemma

Not applicable0.994
Bench or experimental0.031
Metaresearch0.001
Systematic review0.000
Open science0.000
Research integrity0.000
Theoretical or conceptual0.000
Simulation or modelling0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Bibliometrics0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Case report0.000
Qualitative0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Observational0.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread
0.252 how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Motifs rich in arginines and glycines were recognized several decades ago to play functional roles and were termed glycine-arginine-rich (GAR) domains and/or RGG boxes. We review here the evolving functions of the RGG box along with several sequence variations that we collectively term the RGG/RG motif. Greater than 1,000 human proteins harbor the RGG/RG motif, and these proteins influence numerous physiological processes such as transcription, pre-mRNA splicing, DNA damage signaling, mRNA trans…

Retrieved from PubMed through NCBI EFetch. Structured section labels are preserved.