Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phylum Platyhelminthes has traditionally been considered the most basal bilaterian taxon. The main difficulty with this placement is the lack of convincing synapomorphies for all Platyhelminthes, which suggest that they are polyphyletic. Recent molecular findings based on 18S rDNA sequence data and number and type of Hox genes strongly suggest that the majority of Platyhelminthes are members of the lophotrochozoan protostomes, whereas the Acoelomorpha (Acoela + Nemertodermatida) fall outside of the Platyhelminthes as the most basal bilaterian taxon. Here we review phylum-wide analyses based on complete ribosomal and other nuclear genes addressed to answer the main issues facing systematics and phylogeny of Platyhelminthes. We present and discuss (i) new corroborative evidence for the polyphyly of the Platyhelminthes and the basal position of Acoelomorpha; (ii) a new consensus internal tree of the phylum; (iii) the nature of the sister group to the Neodermata and the hypotheses on the origin of parasitism; and (iv) the internal phylogeny of some rhabditophoran orders. Some methodological caveats are also introduced. The need to erect a new phylum, the Acoelomorpha, separate from the Platyhelminthes (now Catenulida + Rhabditophora) and based on present and new morphological and molecular characters is highlighted, and a proposal made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".