MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hot Topic: An Association Between a Leptin Single Nucleotide Polymorphism and Milk and Protein Yield

2003· article· en· W2146998217 on OpenAlexafffund
Fiona Buchanan, Andrew G. Van Kessel, Cheryl Waldner, D. A. Christensen, B. Laarveld, S. M. Schmutz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsLactationLeptinSingle-nucleotide polymorphismBiologyAnimal scienceAlleleDairy cattleGenotypeMilk fatPolymorphism (computer science)ObesityMilk productionEndocrinologyInternal medicineFood sciencePregnancyGeneticsGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allelic variation (C to T transition that results in an Arg25Cys) in the leptin gene has been associated with increased fat deposition in beef cattle. We report that this same genetic variant is also present in dairy breeds. Body fat reserves play an important role in sustaining high milk production in early lactation, when energy intake is limited. To test for an association between the leptin single nucleotide polymorphism and milk productivity, we genotyped 416 Holstein cows and compared lactation performance data using a mixed model. Animals homozygous for the T allele produced more milk (1.5 kg/d vs. CC animals) and had higher somatic cell count linear scores, without significantly affecting milk fat or protein percent over the entire lactation. The increase in milk yield is most prominent in the first 100 d of lactation (2.44 kg/d), declining to 1.74 kg/d between 101 and 200 d in lactation. The milk yield advantage, observed in cows homozygous for the T allele, could represent a major economic advantage to dairy producers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207