Severe retinopathy of prematurity associated with<i>FZD4</i>mutations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether mutations in the FZD4 gene are a risk factor for developing severe ROP. METHODS: Three Canadian tertiary care centers recruited premature infants prospectively and retrospectively, and assigned affectation status based on the maximum degree of severity of ROP recorded in both eyes. Mutation screening of the FZD4 gene was performed using direct sequencing. All sequence changes were evaluated for functional significance. RESULTS: Two novel FZD4 mutations (Ala370Gly or Lys203Asn) were identified in two infants from the severe ROP group (n=71). No mutation was detected in the mild to no ROP group (n=33), and the two novel mutations were absent in 173 random Caucasian samples. Mutation Ala370Gly was also found in one sibling and one parent of the affected infant, but no signs of familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR), a condition with phenotypic overlap with ROP known to be caused by FZD4 mutations, were present in either family member. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in the FZD4 gene in this group of premature infants supports a role for the FZD4 pathway in the development of severe ROP and accounts for approximately 3% of severe ROP in Caucasian premature infants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".