MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2147087518 · doi:10.7202/019919ar

La Constitution canadienne en traduction : quelques pistes de réflexion

2009· article· fr· W2147087518 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ravi J. Gunnoo

Bibliographic record

VenueMeta Journal des traducteurs · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesConstitutionArtPhilosophyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rédigée originellement en anglais, la Constitution canadienne a ensuite été traduite en français. Ce texte de loi consacre le bilinguisme et le bijuridisme sur lesquels le Canada est fondé et, du même coup, la culture de traduction qui est au coeur de la nation canadienne. Or, bien que cet ensemble législatif bilingue soit la loi suprême du Canada, ni les traductologues ni les constitutionnalistes n’ont réalisé une étude comparée des versions anglaise et française de cette Constitution. Dans le cadre du texte qui suit, nous vous présenterons une analyse traductologique relative à deux articles de la Constitution du Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0160.057
Scholarly communication0.0160.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeta Journal des traducteurs→Same topicTranslation Studies and Practices→French-language works237,207→