Ocean thermal conditions in the post-smolt nursery of North American Atlantic salmon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The effect of climate on the post-smolt survival of North American Atlantic salmon is obscure owing to the difficulty in interpreting the only relationships thus far observed between the abundance of these stocks and climate, which focuses on winter conditions. Placing significance on winter post-smolt survival is contrary to conventional thinking that the spring period is more important, because that is when the post-smolts migrate to sea and transition to ocean life takes place. The pre-fishery abundance for North American stocks was compared to thermal conditions in potential post-smolt nursery areas during the period 1982–1999. Pre-fishery abundance was modeled as a reconstruction of one-sea-winter (1SW) and two-sea-winter (2SW) age salmon populations. Cohort abundance was compared to mean temperature and thermal habitat (sea surface area within a given temperature range) in five index areas. Stock size was negatively correlated with mean sea surface temperature during June. Correlations were comparatively stronger between stock abundance and thermal habitat, further asserting that June conditions – the first month at sea for most stocks in the region – may be pivotal to survival. These correlations suggest that post-smolt survival is negatively affected by the early arrival of warm ocean conditions in the nursery area. Hypotheses related to post-smolt migration, predation, and the availability of suitable prey are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".