MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PERIODIC DISTURBANCE CANCELLATION USING A GENERALIZED PHASE-LOCKED LOOP

2010· article· en· W2147230625 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert Schilling, Ahmad F. Al‐Ajlouni, Edward Sazonov, A.K. Ziarani

Bibliographic record

VenueControl and Intelligent Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase-locked loopControl theory (sociology)HarmonicsFundamental frequencyDisturbance (geology)HarmonicLoop (graph theory)SIGNAL (programming language)Noise (video)Computer scienceMathematicsPhysicsAcousticsTelecommunicationsJitterArtificial intelligenceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An effective technique for extracting an audio input from a composite signal that contains a nonstationary noise-corrupted periodic disturbance is presented. The proposed technique cancels the periodic disturbance using a synthesized signal whose parameters are adjusted adaptively. A combination of a generalized phase-locked loop (PLL) and an adaptive least mean square (LMS) method is used. The PLL creates a pair of basis signals that are phase-locked with the fundamental harmonic of the periodic disturbance. Harmonics generated from these basis signals are then used in the LMS method to minimize the average power of the residual nonperiodic signal. The virtue of this approach is that it does not depend on an explicit accurate estimate of the fundamental frequency of the disturbance. Furthermore, relatively large changes in the fundamental frequency can be tracked so long as they remain within the acquisition range of the PLL. Simulations and experimental results are presented that demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueControl and Intelligent SystemsSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207