MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147293067 · doi:10.1111/jace.13372

Enhanced Dielectric and Ferroelectric Properties of <scp>Pb</scp> ( <scp>Mg</scp> <sub>1/3</sub> <scp>Nb</scp> <sub>2/3</sub> ) <sub>0.65</sub> <scp>Ti</scp> <sub>0.35</sub> <scp>O</scp> <sub>3</sub> Ceramics by <scp>ZnO</scp> Modification

2014· article· en· W2147293067 on OpenAlexafffund
Methee Promsawat, Anucha Watcharapasorn, Zuo‐Guang Ye, Sukanda Jiansirisomboon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaThailand Research Fund
KeywordsFerroelectricityMaterials scienceDielectricTetragonal crystal systemCurie temperatureAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CeramicMicrostructureMineralogyFerroelectric ceramicsDopingCrystallographyCrystal structureCondensed matter physicsComposite materialChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phase formation, microstructures, dielectric, and ferroelectric properties of ZnO‐modified Pb(Mg 1/3 Nb 2/3 ) 0.65 Ti 0.35 O 3 (PMNT/ x ZnO, where x = 0, 0.4, 2.0, 4.0, and 11.0 mol%) ceramics were studied. A coexistence of rhombohedral and tetragonal ferroelectric phases was observed at room temperature in all samples. The ceramics with the relative densities of 93%–95% were prepared. The modification by ZnO led to an increase in grain sizes of PMNT ceramics. The maximum dielectric constant of the pure PMNT ceramic was increased with x = 0.4–4.0 mol% ZnO doping, with the highest value being observed in the 2.0 mol% sample. Both the temperature at which the transition between rhombohedral and tetragonal ferroelectric phases took place ( T R‐T ) and the Curie temperature of the ceramics tended to increase with increasing x . The ferroelectric properties were enhanced with increased remanent polarization and P ( E ) loop squareness in the compositions with x = 0.4–4.0 mol%. However, the ferroelectric properties were attenuated with x = 11.0 mol%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.013
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0080.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Ceramic SocietySame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207