MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147337091 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2002.800233

Inundation discriminated using sun glint

2002· article· en· W2147337091 on OpenAlexaff
V. C. Vanderbilt, Guillaume Perry, Gerald P. Livingston, Susan L. Ustin, M.C. Diax Barrios, François‐Marie Bréon, M. Leroy, J. Y. Balois, L. A. Morrissey, S. R. Shewchuk, Joel A. Stearn, Sarah E. Zedler, J.L. Syder, Sophie Bouffiès-Cloché, M. Herman

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexEnvironmental scienceWetlandSpectral signatureVegetation (pathology)Land coverVegetation coverReflectivityGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Land useOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inundation is linked to water, carbon, and energy budgets at landscape to global scales. We describe a new remote-sensing technique for identifying inundated areas based on the properties of the glitter-the strong, angular signature reflection that is characteristic of surface water and uncharacteristic of other cover types. We discriminated three cover types-vegetation emergent above inundated soils, open water, and noninundated cover types-from analysis of directional data collected in the red spectral band by the airborne POLDER (Polarization and Directionality of Earth's Reflectance) sensor. We found that values of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) decreased dramatically in the glitter direction, providing an indication of surface water. Application of our new technique holds promise for mapping the seasonal and interannual extent of inundation, a key descriptor of wetlands hydrology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207