Telepharmacy in a rural Alberta Community Cancer Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Telepharmacy services were developed and adopted to compensate for the absence of a pharmacist in rural Cancer Centers. Preparation included the formation of an advisory committee, development of a training and certification process, establishing new policies and operating procedures, collecting utilization data and a survey of patient and user satisfaction. Pharmacy technicians at two remote community cancer centers were connected by telehealth with pharmacists at one of the two coordinating centers to oversee the compounding of intravenous (I.V.) chemotherapy and provide clinical review of physician orders. In 8 months of telepharmacy use, 247 intravenous preparations were compounded for 47 cancer patients during 109 treatment visits. Approximately 45,000 km (27,000 miles) of patient travel were averted. Pharmacy staff estimates requires an average of 10 additional minutes to process and compound each chemotherapy preparation. Nurses estimate an average of 27.5 additional minutes required to coordinate information for each patient order.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".