MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147387689 · doi:10.1139/y07-062

Dendritic cells in allergic airway inflammationThis article is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Recent Advances in Asthma Research.

2007· review· en· W2147387689 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arpita Bharadwaj, Againdra K. Bewtra, Devendra K. Agrawal

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsImmunologyImmune systemDendritic cellCpG OligodeoxynucleotideCytokineT cellMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dendritic cells (DCs) are primary antigen-presenting cells involved in interactions with T cells leading to the proliferation of TH1 or TH2 cell types. In asthma, predominance of TH2 cells appears to be responsible for disease pathogenesis. Differentiation of TH2 cells is driven by a variety of factors such as the expression of high levels of costimulatory molecules, the cytokine profile, and the subset of DCs. Many inflammatory cells involved in the pathogenesis of asthma either directly or indirectly modulate DC function. Traditional treatments for asthma decrease the number of airway DCs in animals as well as in patients with asthma. Immunomodulators including interleukin (IL)-10, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, cytosine-phosphate-guanosine-containing oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-ODN), 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and fetal liver tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L) are involved in the modulation of the function of DCs. Based on the critical review of the interaction between DCs and other inflammatory cells, we propose that activation of T cells by DCs and sensitization to inhaled allergen and resulting airway inflammation are dependent on plasmacytoid and myeloid subset of lung DCs to induce an immune response or tolerance and are tightly regulated by T-regulatory cells. Effects of various therapeutic agents to modulate the function of lung myeloid DCs have been discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207