Nymph and Adult Biology on Cultivated and on Non-Cultivated Plants and Seasonal Phenology on Wild Plants of the Neotropical Stink Bug, Euschistus paranticus Grazia (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laboratory studies were conducted to evaluate nymph survivorship, developmental time, and fresh body weight at adult emergence, and adult survivorship, total longevity, reproduction, and fresh body weight gain of the Neotropical stink bug, Euschistus paranticus Grazia (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). In the field, a one-year weekly survey was carried out on the wild plants, Scutia buxifolia Reissek (Rhamanaceae) and Prunus myrtifolia (L.) Urb. (Rosaceae) in Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil (28°15'S latitude; 52°24'W longitude). Results indicated that nymph mortality was very high (range 87-100%) and on only two (green bean pod + raw shelled peanut and green bean pod alone) out of the nine foods, nymphs were able to complete development. Nymph developmental time (2nd to 5th stadia) took about 33 days on green bean pod + peanut seed, and about 54 days on green bean pod. Adults E. paranticus fed pods of green bean, raw shelled peanut, mature seed of soybean, and leaf of S. buxifolia in the laboratory showed a total longevity of about 40 to 55 days; 50% females oviposited; the pre-oviposition period was 18.9 days; number of egg masses/female was 9.3; mean total number of eggs/female was 103.6, and their viability was 55.6%. Females were heavier than males. E. paranticus was intercepted mostly during spring-summer on S. buxifolia, and only occasionally on P. myrtifolia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".