The tight junction protein claudin-3 shows conserved expression in the nephric duct and ureteric bud and promotes tubulogenesis in vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The claudin family of proteins is required for the formation of tight junctions that are contact points between epithelial cells. Although little is known of the cellular events by which epithelial cells of the ureteric bud form tubules and branch, tubule formation is critical for kidney development. We hypothesize that if claudin-3 (Cldn3) is expressed within tight junctions of the ureteric bud, this will affect ureteric bud cell shape and tubule formation. Using transmission electron microscopy, we identified tight junctions within epithelial cells of the ureteric bud. Whole mount in situ hybridization and immunoassays were performed in the mouse and chick and demonstrated that Cldn3 transcript and protein were expressed in the nephric duct, the ureteric bud, and its derivatives at critical time points during tubule formation and branching. Mouse inner medullary collecting duct cells (mIMCD-3) form tubules when seeded in a type I collagen matrix and were found to coexpress CLDN3 and the tight junction marker zonula occludens-1 in the cell membrane. When these cells were stably transfected with Cldn3 fused to the enhanced green fluorescent protein reporter, multiple clones showed a significant increase in tubule formation compared with controls (P < 0.05) due in part to an increase in cell proliferation (P < 0.01). Cldn3 may therefore promote tubule formation and expansion of the ureteric bud epithelium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".