MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of collaborative interactivity in the observational practice of clinical skills

2012· article· en· W2147650361 on OpenAlexaff
Lawrence Grierson, Maureen Barry, Bill Kapralos, Heather Carnahan, Adam Dubrowski

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationThe Wilson CentreOntario Tech UniversityUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyChecklistTest (biology)InteractivityContext (archaeology)Observational learningPsychologyMedical educationMedicineComputer scienceMultimediaMathematics educationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Video-based observational practice can extend simulation-based learning outside the training space. This study explores the value of collaborative feedback provided during observational practice to the acquisition of clinical skills. METHODS: Nursing students viewed a video demonstrating the proper ventrogluteal injection technique before performing a videotaped pre-test trial on a simulator. They were then assigned randomly to one of three observational practice groups: a group that observed the expert demonstration (EO group); a group that viewed the expert demonstration, self-assessed their individual pre-test and contrasted their self-assessments with expert feedback (ESO group), and a group that observed the expert demonstration, self-assessed and contrasted their assessments with those of an expert, and formed a community that engaged in peer-to-peer feedback (ESPO group). The observation of all videos, the provision of assessments and all networking occurred via an Internet-mediated network. After 2 weeks, participants returned for post-tests and transfer tests. RESULTS: The pre-test-post-test analyses revealed significant interactions (global rating scale: F((2,22)) =4.00 [p =0.033]; checklist: F((2,22)) =4.31 [p =0.026]), which indicated that post-test performance in the ESPO group was significantly better than pre-test performance. The transfer analyses revealed main effects for both the global rating scale (F((2,23)) =6.73; p =0.005) and validated checklist (F((2,23)) =7.04; p =0.004) measures. Participants in the ESPO group performed better on the transfer test than those in the EO group. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that video-based observational practice can be effective in extending simulation-based learning, but its effectiveness is mediated by the amount of time the learner spends engaged in the practice and the type of learning activities the learner performs in the observational practice environment. We speculate that increasing collaborative interactivity supports observational learning by increasing the extent to which the educational environment can accommodate learners' specific needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.468 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical EducationSame topicSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207