MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147701483 · doi:10.1074/mcp.m300080-mcp200

Identification of Metal-binding Proteins in Human Hepatoma Lines by Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

2003· article· en· W2147701483 on OpenAlexaff
Yi‐Min She, Suree Narindrasorasak, Suyun Yang, Naomi Spitale, Eve A. Roberts, Bibudhendra Sarkar

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular & Cellular Proteomics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryMetalloproteinPeptideHep G2Affinity chromatographyChromatographyBiochemistryElectrospray ionizationIn vitroEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The metalloproteome is defined as the set of proteins that have metal-binding capacity by being metalloproteins or having metal-binding sites. A different metalloproteome may exist for each metal. Mass spectrometric characterization of metalloproteomes provides valuable information relating to cellular disposition of metals physiologically and in metal-associated diseases. We examined the Cu and Zn metalloproteomes in three human hepatoma lines: Hep G2 and Mz-Hep-1, which retain many functional characteristics of normal human hepatocytes, and SK-Hep-1, which is poorly differentiated. Additionally we studied a single specimen of normal human liver and Hep G2 cells depleted in vitro of cellular copper. We used matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization and electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to analyze peptide sequences of tryptic digests obtained by either in-gel digestion of metal-binding proteins or peptides on an immobilized metal affinity chromatography column loaded with either Cu or Zn. Mainly high abundance proteins were identified. Cu-binding proteins identified included enolase, albumin, transferrin, and alcohol dehydrogenase as well as certain intracellular chaperone proteins. The Cu metalloproteome was not identical to the Zn metalloproteome. Peptide binding experiments demonstrated that Cu coordination prefers the order of residues histidine > methionine > cysteine. Although the Cu metalloproteome was similar from line to line, subtle differences were apparent. Gel profiling showed more extensive variation in expression of annexin II in SK-Hep-1 and Mz-Hep-1 than in Hep G2 and normal liver tissue. Glycerylphosphorylethanolamine was identified as a post-translational modification at residue Glu-301 of elongation factor 1-alpha in Hep G2. Intracellular copper depletion was associated with loss of the glycerylphosphoryl side group. These findings suggest that post-translational modification could be affected by intracellular actions of copper. Comparison of the Cu and Zn metalloproteomes in Hep G2 with a published general proteome of Hep G2 disclosed little overlap (Seow, T. K., et al. (2001) Proteomics 1, 1249-1263). Proteins in the metalloproteomes of human hepatocytes can be identified by these methods. Variations in these metalloproteomes may have important physiological relevance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations105
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular & Cellular ProteomicsSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207