MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Siphon Removal of Cohesionless Materials

2005· article· en· W2147875346 on OpenAlexafffund
Subhan Ullah, Kerry A. Mazurek, N. Rajaratnam, Stanley Reitsma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFroude numberInletSiphon (mollusc)Tube (container)Geotechnical engineeringGeologyMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Relative densityMaterials sciencePhysicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the results of an experimental study of the scour created by a siphon flow through a vertical tube of diameter d of 9.7 to 20.4mm in a cohesionless sand bed of approximately uniform size D of 0.58mm. The position of the inlet of the siphon tube ranged from −101.6 to 6.4mm relative to the surface of the sand bed and the velocity of flow through the tube U0 varied from 0.34 to 6.41m∕s. Data from this and previous studies are used to show the radial extent of the scour hole and the maximum depth of scour depend primarily on the densimetric Froude number F0, where F0=U0∕g(Δρ∕ρ)D, g is the gravitational acceleration, Δρ is the difference in density between the sediment and fluid, and ρ is the density of the fluid. A theoretical analysis of the problem is used to further assess the data and it is found that viscous effects are also important to consider. The profile of the scour hole at equilibrium, for all tube positions, is found to be similar when the scour depth is measured relative to the tube inlet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207