MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147901628 · doi:10.1145/1454586.1454589

Throughput and QoS optimization in nonuniform multichannel wireless mesh networks

2008· article· en· W2147901628 on OpenAlexaff
Ted H. Szymanski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceWireless mesh networkScheduling (production processes)Quality of serviceWirelessWireless networkTelecommunicationsMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A technology to increase throughput and QoS in infrastructure-based Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) is proposed. In a uniform WMN, let each Base Station (BS) have R1 transceivers for communications with neighboring BSs, and R2 transceivers for communications with the Stationary and Mobile Subscribers within the wireless cell. One Gateway BS provides access to the global Internet, and the throughput capacity of the entire WMN is constrained by the IO bandwidth of the Gateway. A small number of extra wireless links can be added to the Gateway BS and selected other BSs, resulting in a nonuniform system. The addition of an asymptotically small number of transceivers can increase WMN capacity several fold. Efficient scheduling requires the partitioning of an asymmetric bipartite graph representing a general traffic rate matrix, into multiple graphs representing doubly-stochastic matrices. Routing and scheduling algorithms presented. The algorithms can provision long-term multimedia flows including VOIP or IPTV with guaranteed service. For multichannel WMNs where the traffic is routed and partitioned, the number of queued cells per BS is near-minimal and bounded, the end-to-end delay and jitter are near-minimal and bounded, and cell loss rates due to scheduling conflicts are zero. The algorithm also achieves 100% of capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207