Grouping patterns, reproduction, and dispersal in a population of sitatungas (<i>Tragelaphus spekei gratus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A population of sitatungas (Tragelaphus spekei gratus) living in a forest swamp clearing, Maya Nord, in the Republic of Congo was studied over 3½ years and its grouping patterns and population dynamics were analysed. The sitatungas in this clearing formed a stable group, which remained in residence. The group (1636 individuals) functioned like a harem. As a result of intrasexual competition, all the males and some of the females born at Maya left the group before reaching sexual maturity. We hypothesize that this large grouping resulted from the development of a tendency for females to be gregarious for reasons related to food availability. This tendency, combined with an aseasonal pattern of reproduction, favours direct monopolization of females by one male. Social and mating strategies observed at Maya fit the model of "female-defence polygyny" (Emlen and Oring). Our results provide an argument in favour of relating food availability and grouping patterns, and underline the plasticity of social organization and mating strategies in sitatungas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".