MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS OF PLASMA CORTICOID LEVELS, INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE AND AQUEOUS OUTFLOW FACILITY IN NORMAL AND GLAUCOMATOUS EYES *

2006· article· en· W2147993599 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas A. Boyd, Lauren McLeod

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular and Laser Science Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMedical Research CouncilUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsIntraocular pressureOphthalmologyMedicineCircadian rhythmAnnalsCitationLibrary scienceGerontologyInternal medicineArtClassics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mean intra-ocular pressure (IOP) for normal eyes is 15 mm.Hg.and this pressure is'the result of a balanced inflow and outflow of aqueous humor.Aqueous inflow is the result of a secretion from the ciliary body.The flow passes between the lens and the iris, through the pupil into the anterior chamber, and then it is removed from the eye through a trabecular network in the angle, and so into the canal of Schlemm.Exit channels from the canal carry the aqueous humor into the episcleral venules on the outside of the eyeball a little posterior to the corneal margin.The control of inflow and outflow is not perfect, and there are variations in pressure, partly haphazard, but largely with a regular circadian rhythm.The pressure tends to be at its lowest in the late evening and early morning.Later in the morning it rises, reaching its maximum, usually between 8:OO A.M. and noon.If IOP has a circadian rhythm, then one must assume that there is also a circadian rhythm of aqueous inflow and aqueous outflow. Aqueous InflowAttempts to investigate the dynamics of aqueous inflow in living human eyes are fraught with difficulty because any instrumental interference tends to alter the status quo.Researchers have had to be dependent upon indirect measurements validated incompletely by direct measurements on living animal eyes and dead human eyes.Ericson' of Sweden, using an indirect method, found that aqueous inflow levels in normal eyes are three times higher by day than by night.Plasma corticoid levels are also higher by day than by night.? The possibility of an interrelationship between plasma corticoids and aqueous inflow prompted Linner,3 in 1959, to instill prednisolone locally in one eye of normal subjects.He found that aqueous inflow was significantly raised in the treated eyes in comparison with the untreated control eyes.He therefore suggested that there is a connection between the function of the adrenal cortex and the rate of aqueous flow.Ericson's and Linner's findings suggested to us that the conditions which occur in the glaucomatous eye might provide an opportunity to investigate further the relationship between plasma corticoids and aqueous *This investigation was financed by giants from the Special Services Committee of the University of Alberta Hospital, the Medical Research Council NO.M.A. 753, the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation and National Health Grant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicOcular and Laser Science ResearchFrench-language works237,207