MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148031163 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1004125

Tumors Suppress In Situ Proliferation of Cytotoxic T Cells by Promoting Differentiation of Gr-1+ Conventional Dendritic Cells through IL-6

2011· article· en· W2148031163 on OpenAlexafffund
Jun Diao, Jun Zhao, Erin Winter, Mark S. Cattral

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
KeywordsCytotoxic T cellDiphtheria toxinCTL*CD8Cancer researchCD11cBiologyImmunotherapyTumor microenvironmentDendritic cellImmunologyCell biologyChemistryImmune systemTumor cellsToxinIn vitroMicrobiologyPhenotypeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancers are often accompanied by inflammation, which can promote tumor growth, invasion, and metastases. We show that the tumor microenvironment induces the development of a Gr-1(+) conventional dendritic cell (cDC) subpopulation that is functionally defective. Gr-1(+)cDCs differentiated from recruited immediate precursors of cDCs, a process supported by the inflammatory cytokine milieu in tumors. Inhibition of Gr-1(+)cDC differentiation enhanced intratumor expansion of cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells (CTLs), resulting in suppression of tumor growth. Diphtheria toxin treatment of CD11c-diphtheria toxin receptor chimeras revealed the importance of intratumor cDCs in stimulating CTL proliferation in situ. Our study demonstrates a key role of intratumor cDCs in determining antitumor CTL responses and suggests that they may be an appropriate target for tumor immunotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207