Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenuePhysics Letters B · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research Council CanadaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónGeorgian National Science FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanada Foundation for InnovationMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoLundbeckfondenAustrian Science FundStichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der MaterieAustralian Research CouncilNational Science CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSChinese Academy of SciencesDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Science FoundationBrookhaven National LaboratoryEuropean Research CouncilMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueRoyal SocietyCERNGerman-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and DevelopmentDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Türkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchArizona-Nevada Academy of ScienceDanmarks GrundforskningsfondAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungIsrael Science FoundationGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
KeywordsPhysicsLeptonParticle physicsHiggs bosonLarge Hadron ColliderNuclear physicsRapidityInvariant massMuonBosonRest framePair productionStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Phase spaceElectronAstrophysicsGalaxy
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexet la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publis ou non, manant des tablissements d'enseignement et de recherche franais ou trangers, des laboratoires publics ou privs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
