Comparative Specificities of Two Evolutionarily Divergent Hydrolases Involved in Microbial Degradation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2-Hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dienoate (HOPDA) hydrolase (BphD) is a key determinant in the aerobic transformation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by Burkholderia sp. strain LB400 (S. Y. K. Seah, G. Labbé, S. Nerdinger, M. Johnson, V. Snieckus, and L. D. Eltis, J. Biol. Chem. 275:15701-15708, 2000). To determine whether this is also true in divergent biphenyl degraders, the homologous hydrolase of Rhodococcus globerulus P6, BphD(P6), was hyperexpressed, purified to apparent homogeneity, and studied by steady-state kinetics. BphD(P6) hydrolyzed HOPDA with a k(cat)/K(m) of 1.62 (+/- 0.03) x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1) (100 mM phosphate [pH 7.5], 25 degrees C), which is within 70% of that of BphD(LB400). BphD(P6) was also similar to BphD(LB400) in that it catalyzed the hydrolysis of HOPDAs bearing chloro substituents on the phenyl moiety at least 25 times more specifically than those bearing chloro substituents on the dienoate moiety. However, the rhodococcal enzyme was significantly more specific for 9-Cl and 10-Cl HOPDAs, catalyzing the hydrolysis of 9-Cl, 10-Cl, and 9,10-diCl HOPDAs two- to threefold respectively, more specifically than HOPDA. Moreover, 4-Cl HOPDA competitively inhibited BphD(P6) more effectively than 3-Cl HOPDA, which is the inverse of what was observed in BphD(LB400). These results demonstrate that BphD is a key determinant in the aerobic transformation of PCBs by divergent biphenyl degraders, but that there exists significant diversity in the specificity of these biphenyl hydrolases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".