MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148203565 · doi:10.4141/cjss2011-087

Cartographie numérique de la capacité maximale de sorption du phosphore des sols à l’échelle de la parcelle agricole à l'aide de variables auxiliaires

2012· article· fr· W2148203565 on OpenAlexaffvenue
M. Quenum, Michel C. Nolin, Monique Bernier

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quenum, M., Nolin, M. C. et Bernier, M. 2012. Cartographie numerique de la capacite maximale de sorption du phosphore des sols a l’echelle de la parcelle agricole a l'aide de variables auxiliaires. Can. J. Soil Sci. 92: 733–750. La gestion modulee des engrais a base de P en fonction de la variabilite spatiale de la capacite maximale de sorption du phosphore (CMSP) des sols propose des solutions pour reduire la contamination des eaux de surface par le P a l’echelle de la parcelle agricole. Les objectifs de l’etude sont 1) caracteriser et interpreter en termes de strategie d’echantillonnage des sols l'intensite de la variation et la structure d'organisation spatiale de trois indicateurs de la CMSP, soit les teneurs en aluminium et fer extraits au Mehlich-3 ou a l'oxalate d'ammonium (AlM3, AlM3+FeM3 et Alox+Feox) et 2) evaluer l'utilite de variables auxiliaires (modele numerique d’elevation, image IKONOS ou conductivite electrique apparente (CEA) des sols mesuree a l'aide du VERIS 3100 ou du Geonics EM-38) a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207