MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148223447 · doi:10.2174/1568013023358799

Genetic Lipodystrophies: Models for Insulin Resistance

2002· article· en· W2148223447 on OpenAlexaff
Bentham Science Publisher Robert A. Hegele

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Medicinal Chemistry - Immunology Endocrine & Metabolic Agents · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipodystrophyInsulin resistanceLMNAHyperinsulinemiaDyslipidemiaMedicineAcanthosis nigricansHyperlipidemiaEndocrinologyGeneticsInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusBioinformaticsBiologyMutationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The common syndrome of insulin resistance with hyperinsulinemia is frequently associated with a collection of metabolic abnormalities, including dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes. Lipodystrophy syndromes, which include both genetic and acquired forms, resemble the insulin resistance syndrome, particularly with respect to the presence of associated biochemical disturbances such as hyperlipidemia and diabetes. Since the discovery in 1999 that mutant LMNA causes Dunnigan-type partial lipodystrophy, human mutations in three other genes have been implicated in inherited lipodystrophy syndromes, namely PPARG in partial lipodystrophy, and AGPAT and BSCL2 in complete lipodystrophy. There is evidence for additional genetic heterogeneity for lipodystrophy syndromes. Delineation of the human molecular genetic basis of forms of inherited lipodystrophy may help to identify pathways and molecular targets for the common insulin resistance syndrome and for acquired drug-induced lipodystrophy syndromes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Medicinal Chemistry - Immunology Endocrine & Metabolic AgentsSame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207